Remember that Linux does not need enormous popularity to succeed. If, however, by "games" you mean "proprietary retail boxed games," then I do not agree with you that these games are necessary for success. ![]() What do you mean by "games?" Do you mean the free games that come with every redhat CD? If you count those as games, then Linux already has games, and your point is moot. While I don't want to go as far as Abigail here, I find no truth in your comment that "If Linux is ever going to succeed as a desktop OS then it's going to need games."
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |